Model–Software–Hardware Co-Design · Edge AI · Custom ASICs

TrueASIC: The Chip Knows
Its Own Software

XgenSilicon co-designs the model, compiler, runtime, and ASIC as a single system — so every transistor is shaped by the model it runs, and every software layer is shaped by the silicon beneath it.

TrueASIC Lab

Co-Design

Methodology

Model, SW & HW optimized together, not in sequence

Per-Model

ASIC Architecture

Silicon shaped to each AI workload

Edge-First

Design Philosophy

Power · Latency · On-Device Privacy

// The Co-Design Advantage

One Feedback Loop.
Two Sides of Silicon.

Traditional chip design runs model, software, and hardware through separate, sequential phases. XgenSilicon closes that gap — the model specs, compiler, runtime, and ASIC architecture co-evolve in a tight feedback cycle where every layer informs every other.

CO-DESIGNLOOPSWModelSpecHWHW ArchSearchSWHW-AwareCompilerHWSiliconImpl.
SW

Model Specification

Operator graphs, quantization targets, and latency budgets are encoded as constraints — not afterthoughts. The model becomes the specification the hardware is built around.

HW

HW Architecture Search

Proprietary AI methods traverse a large space of micro-architecture candidates in simulation, evaluating tradeoffs against the live model graph before a single gate is placed.

SW

HW-Aware Compilation

Code generation is derived for the exact silicon topology — not a generic target. The compiler and the chip share a common interface from day one.

HW

Silicon Implementation

RTL is generated from co-optimized block primitives. Model, software, and silicon are validated in lock-step — closing the loop so the next model iteration starts from a stronger baseline.

01

Model Specification

SW

AI model architecture, operator graph, and target accuracy/latency requirements are defined.

02

HW Architecture Search

HW

Proprietary AI methods explore the hardware space — guided by the model graph — to find the optimal architecture for the workload.

03

HW-Aware Compilation

SW

The compiler re-optimizes the model for the discovered hardware — code generation is specific to the target silicon, not a generic backend.

04

Silicon Implementation

HW

Custom ASIC is implemented using the co-optimized block library. Model, software, and hardware are validated together.

↺ continuous feedback loop
// Where XgenSilicon Competes

The applications where cloud inference is not an option

Autonomous vehicles, surgical robots, personal wearables, and on-device AI models share two hard constraints: latency that a datacenter round-trip cannot meet, and data that cannot leave the device. Off-the-shelf NPUs address latency but leave data sovereignty to the vendor. Custom silicon addresses both.

Inference latency

Round-trip to compute

Cloud Inference

Network + queue delay

NPU

Reduced latency

XgenSilicon Custom ASIC

On-device, purpose-built

Data stays on-device

No egress to external infra

Cloud Inference

Data sent to datacenter

NPU

Depends on vendor config

XgenSilicon Custom ASIC

Full data sovereignty (design target)

Firmware auditability

Customer can inspect full stack

Cloud Inference

Vendor-managed

NPU

Vendor-managed firmware

XgenSilicon Custom ASIC

Full-stack owned by customer

Workload specificity

Silicon matched to the model

Cloud Inference

General-purpose GPU

NPU

General-purpose NPU

XgenSilicon Custom ASIC

Co-designed for workload (design target)

Power envelope

Suitable for battery / embedded / wearable

Cloud Inference

Datacenter power draw

NPU

Mobile-class, tight for wearables

XgenSilicon Custom ASIC

Optimized per workload (design target)

Meets requirement
Partial / depends on config
Does not meet requirement
XgenSilicon ratings reflect design targets
// The Full Stack

One Platform,
Both Sides of Silicon

Every layer of the XgenSilicon platform — model, compiler, runtime, block library, and ASIC — is built to be aware of every other layer. That's what Model–Software–Hardware Co-Design means in practice.

XgenSilicon custom ASIC chip architecture

// Custom ASIC Die

Per-Model Silicon Architecture

Model-Aware Compiler

Built to understand the exact silicon it targets. The compiler is derived from the model graph — not adapted from a generic backend — so every operator maps to the hardware it was designed for.

Model-Guided Architecture Search

The AI model is the specification the hardware search runs against. Architecture candidates are evaluated against the live model graph — so the silicon is shaped by the workload from the first iteration.

Proprietary Silicon IP Library

A purpose-built library of silicon building blocks, each designed with its software interface in mind — so the compiler and the chip share a common language from day one.

Co-Designed Runtime

From model ingestion to on-chip execution, the runtime is built alongside the ASIC — not ported to it. Model, software, and silicon share a single interface with no translation layers between them.

// The Model-to-Silicon Difference

The model shapes the silicon.
The silicon shapes the model.

Most chip design flows treat the AI model as a fixed input — a spec handed to the compiler, which hands a spec to the hardware team. Each layer inherits constraints it had no part in setting. XgenSilicon inverts that: model architecture, software stack, and silicon are co-optimized as a single system, with every layer continuously informing every other.

Traditional

Traditional ASIC Design Flow

ModelModel Freeze
HWHW Specification
HWRTL Design
re-spin risk
SWCompiler Port
re-spin risk
SWCo-Validation
HWTape-out

The model is a fixed input. Hardware specs are set without visibility into compiler needs. The compiler is written without visibility into final silicon. Each layer inherits constraints it had no part in shaping — and re-spins are the cost of discovering that late.

XgenSilicon

Model-to-Silicon Co-Design Flow

ModelModel Specification
feedback
HWAI Architecture Search
feedback
SWModel-Aware Compiler
feedback
HWSilicon Implementation
feedback
SWCross-Layer Validation
feedback
HWTape-out

The model shapes the silicon. The silicon shapes the model. Model architecture, compiler, and hardware co-evolve — every layer has visibility into every other, so constraints are resolved at the point where they cost the least.

Model — AI model architecture
SW — Software / compiler
HW — Silicon / hardware
Re-spin risk
Cross-layer feedback

This diagram illustrates the structural difference in design methodology. It does not represent validated timelines or measured outcomes. XgenSilicon's Model–Software–Hardware Co-Design approach is a design-intent target; no silicon has been validated in production.

// Mission

Why Model-to-Silicon
Co-Design Changes Everything

When model requirements, software architecture, and hardware specs are each locked in before the next layer can react, efficiency is lost at every boundary. XgenSilicon's platform keeps all three layers in continuous dialogue — so the compiler targets the exact silicon, and the silicon is built for the model.

We serve teams building autonomous systems, industrial robotics, personal wearables, and consumer electronics who need differentiated Edge AI products — and need them on a timeline that matters.

Model-to-Silicon Co-DesignPer-Model SiliconLow PowerLow LatencyOn-Device Privacy
Meet the team
// RL Architecture Search

AI that designs the hardware it runs on

Reinforcement learning agents explore millions of micro-architecture candidates in simulation — evaluating power, area, and throughput tradeoffs against the live model graph — before a single gate is placed.

AI Architecture Search

AI-Driven Co-Design Loop · Model-to-Silicon PPA Frontier

initialising…

// AI co-design loop — runs until convergence

🧠

AI Search Agent

Explores architecture candidates

↓
⚙

Architecture Config

Candidate hardware configuration

↓
⚡

Fast Evaluator

Estimates PPA without full simulation

↓
📐

Objective Signal

Power · Performance · Area tradeoff

↓
↺

Agent Update

Search policy refined from feedback

// Output: Pareto-optimal PPA frontier

ILLUSTRATIVEArea →Perf ↑Power →← optimise
Design candidates
Pareto frontier
AI agent path

PPA

Optimisation objective

Power · Performance · Area

3D

Pareto frontier

All three axes simultaneously

Auto

No manual tuning required

AI-driven search

Conceptual illustration of AI-driven PPA optimisation. Axes are relative; no silicon measurements implied.

// Insights

XgenSilicon Blog

All posts
ARXIV

Closing the loop: AI designs the hardware it runs on

An exploration of AI-driven approaches to ASIC hardware architecture — from model specification to silicon.

Read Article
ARXIV

Hardware-Aware NN Compilation with LearnedOptimization

Our latest research on AI-driven optimization techniques for neural network compilation targeting edge ASICs.

Read Article
EETimes Article

What are the metrics for evaluating Edge AI Chip?

A comprehensive breakdown of the key performance indicators that matter most when benchmarking edge AI silicon.

Read Article
LinkedIn Post

ASIC for LLM-on-device?

Exploring the case for custom silicon as the path to efficient, private, and low-latency LLM inference at the edge.

Read Article
// Technical Deep Dive

Per-Model ASIC Technology

Explore the technical foundations of our System Software stack and custom ASIC platform — the Model–Software–Hardware Co-Design methodology in full detail.

Model–Software–Hardware Co-Design methodology and technical foundations of the TrueASIC platform.
// Get In Touch

Start Your
Model-to-Silicon Journey

Tell us about your edge AI application. We'll show you how Model–Software–Hardware Co-Design — aligning the model, System Software stack, and custom ASIC from day one — can get you to silicon faster and more efficiently.

2445 Augustine Drive, Suite 150 Santa Clara, CA, USA

XgenSilicon Inc.

Edge AI System Software & Custom ASICs